Beyond Access: How Family Power Dynamics Shape Postpartum Care in Pakistan

Postpartum care in Pakistan is shaped not only by the availability of medical services but by the family power structures that determine whether women are able to use them. Understanding how patriarchal norms and household authority influence access, autonomy, and recovery is essential for addressing persistent gaps between clinical recommendations and women’s lived experiences of postpartum health.

This study asks: How do family dynamics and patriarchal norms in Pakistan shape women’s postpartum care, decision-making power, and recovery experiences? To answer this question, I conducted in-person surveys with 102 postpartum and first-time pregnant women at the Civil Hospital Gynecology Clinic in Sialkot. The survey combined quantitative measures of access, support, and trust with open-ended qualitative responses that captured personal narratives. This mixed-methods design allowed both identification of broad patterns and deeper insight into how women navigate care within their families.

Findings show that education and geography were strong predictors of postpartum autonomy, with women who had higher levels of schooling or who lived in urban or nuclear households reporting more shared decision-making and comfort expressing health needs. Family influence functioned as both support and restriction. Many husbands encouraged clinic visits and helped with household responsibilities, while mothers-in-law in joint families often upheld traditional expectations that delayed or limited care. Although most women trusted medical professionals, many still waited for family approval before acting on advice.

These results suggest that maternal health interventions in Pakistan should involve entire families, especially husbands and elderly women, in order to improve postpartum care and support women’s recovery.

Introduction

Maternal health after childbirth is a critical yet often overlooked aspect of women’s well-being in Pakistan. Postpartum care, which refers to the medical treatment, emotional support, and social conditions that shape a woman’s recovery in the weeks and months after giving birth, goes beyond access to clinics. It is shaped by family power dynamics and cultural norms that determine who controls a woman’s body and recovery. In many households, mothers-in-law or husbands make key decisions about medical treatment, nutrition, and rest, leaving new mothers with limited autonomy. This family-centered control reflects patriarchal norms, meaning the beliefs and expectations that grant men and elder family members authority over women’s bodies, choices, and mobility. These systems of authority influence women’s physical recovery and emotional health in ways that are often invisible in clinical discussions. Understanding postpartum care provides insight into how social structures in Pakistan can both support and restrict a woman’s path to healing. Building on this context, this study is guided by the question: How do family dynamics and patriarchal norms in Pakistan shape women’ s postpartum care, support, and recovery experiences, including access to medical care, emotional support, and decision-making power? This paper first reviews existing research on postpartum care and inequality, then presents survey findings from Sialkot, and concludes with an analysis of how family dynamics shape women’s recovery experiences.

Postpartum health has lasting effects on maternal well-being and child development, which makes this question especially important to investigate. In many parts of Pakistan, women’s health choices are filtered through family authority and cultural traditions, and this can either support or delay recovery. Studying these dynamics allows us to understand why some women are able to access professional medical support while others rely primarily on family guidance or cultural practices. It also highlights the importance of trust, authority, and gender relations in shaping health outcomes.

To address this question, I relied on original survey data that I collected at the Civil Hospital in Sialkot, Pakistan. I selected the Civil Hospital Gynecology Clinic as my primary research site because it allowed me to reach women from diverse social and economic backgrounds living in both urban and rural areas. Through my survey, I gathered information on access to care, the involvement of family members, and the kinds of support women received. Since I administered the survey in person, I was also able to include open-ended questions that encouraged respondents to share their personal stories. Their responses offered valuable insight into how women experienced cultural expectations and family authority in their daily lives. By combining quantitative and qualitative methods, I was able to identify overall trends while also preserving the individual voices of women whose recovery was shaped by their families and communities.

From the data collected, findings reveal a complex picture of postpartum care in Pakistan. Many women described receiving strong support from family members, particularly from husbands who encouraged medical visits, accompanied them to clinics, and sometimes shared childcare or household tasks. This stands in contrast to other accounts in the literature that emphasize restrictive family control, showing that women’s experiences vary widely. The most important contribution here is that support within families can act as a turning point, allowing women to act on medical advice rather than being blocked by household hierarchies. At the same time, women living in conjoint or extended households also reported tension with mothers-in-law, whose hesitation about biomedical care created delays or doubts. Taken together, these findings suggest that postpartum care is shaped less by the availability of services alone and more by how Mother in Laws and paternal family members negotiate authority, trust, and responsibility in everyday life.

These findings point to the need for maternal health programs in Pakistan that address both medical and social factors. Policies that focus only on clinical services risk overlooking the influence of family authority and cultural norms on women’s ability to access care. Interventions that involve husbands, mothers-in-law, and other key family members may be more effective in improving outcomes because they address the reality that health decisions are often made collectively. At the same time, strengthening women’s education and building trust in healthcare providers can help shift reliance away from restrictive practices toward evidence-based care.

More broadly, discussions of maternal health in Pakistan are often shaped by stereotypes that portray women as powerless victims of tradition. While patriarchy and inequality remain pressing barriers, the findings here show that women’s experiences are more complex, shaped by both restriction and support. This variation is not random, it tends to follow predictable special patterns shaped by class and household structure. For instance women in urban and nuclear often exercise more autonomy than women who live in either rural and conjoint family systems. Recognizing this nuance matters because it opens space for imagining new forms of intervention that are grounded in women’s actual realities rather than external assumptions. There is also a clear need for further research that captures these diverse experiences, especially studies that center women’s own voices and explore how family dynamics are changing across different communities. By situating postpartum health within both medical and cultural contexts, this study highlights how improving maternal well-being in Pakistan requires not only better services but also new ways of thinking about women in these settings.

Literature Review

Information Pathways and Trust in Pregnancy Guidance

Understanding how Pakistani women receive and interpret information about pregnancy and postpartum care is central to examining how family dynamics and patriarchal structures shape their health decisions. Habib et al. (2017) found that while nearly 90% of women were aware of at least one contraceptive method, only one-third had ever used them, with unintended pregnancies reported in over one-third of antenatal patients. Health care providers were cited most frequently as the primary source of family planning information, yet the gap between knowledge and practice reflected deeper barriers, including illiteracy, rural residence, and short birth intervals. These structural and educational constraints indicate that medical advice alone does not guarantee adoption of practices, especially when women lack the autonomy or support to act upon it.

Similar evidence from Thatta underscores how trust mediates whether medical guidance is even considered credible. Asim et al. (2021) showed that mistrust of public facilities and fear of biomedical interventions, such as iron/folate tablets or tetanus vaccination, pushed families toward traditional healers, home remedies, or spiritual leaders. Even when women expressed interest in facility births, decisions were often overridden by family members who favored cheaper home-based care. In my survey, 91% of respondents said family members were their main source of pregnancy information, while 78% cited medical professionals, showing that family remains the most influential actor even when clinical advice is available. However there is one limitation in the sample collected, which is the number of women who decided to opt for home care over medical facilities. Omer et al. (2021) also described delays in hospital care due to reliance on spiritual advice, with fatal consequences in some cases. These findings highlight that information is filtered not just through women’s individual understanding but through the social and cultural expectations imposed by family and community.

Past literature shows that women often view family members such as husbands, mothers-in-law, or elders as more credible than doctors. My survey aligns with this pattern: 36% of women reported that their in-laws were “very important” in decision-making, and over 43% of women who sought spiritual advice did so at the request of family members, not by personal choice. At the same time, some studies suggest that increased exposure to clinics or health workers may encourage women to place greater value on medical advice. In my data, 77% of women reported fully trusting medical professionals, showing that trust in doctors is rising but is still expressed within a family-influenced environment. These possibilities create an important motivation to examine how women balance family authority with professional guidance during the postpartum period.

According to Atif et al. (2023), partner support plays a critical role in whether women are able to follow medical advice and access maternal health services. Using national data from the Pakistan Maternal Mortality Survey, the authors found that women whose husbands provided emotional and financial support, helped with pregnancy-related decisions, or accompanied them to health facilities experienced safer childbirth and better maternal outcomes. Their findings show that supportive husbands can help women overcome restrictive family norms and strengthen trust in medical care, illustrating how family roles shape not only who shares health information but also who acts on it. In my survey, 60% of husbands helped with daily household responsibilities, and 40% of couples discussed pregnancy decisions often, suggesting that support from husbands can soften the effects of restrictive household norms. In many households, doubts raised by mothers-in-law could be set aside if husbands pushed for medical treatment. This shows that families with more flexible or shared decision-making are more likely to act on medical guidance, creating pathways that allow women to get care. It also shows that families are not all the same; some continue strict traditions while others move away from them.

In the end, asking who in the family makes the final decision is not just about telling stories. It matters because it shows that trust and care-seeking depend on specific family relationships, not only on general views of medicine. This means that interventions need to look beyond women alone and instead reach the household as a whole. Working with husbands, addressing mothers-in-law, and understanding how authority shifts within families can turn social influence into a tool for improving access to care.

Interpersonal Relationships and Support Systems

Postpartum care in Pakistan is inseparable from household and community relationships, where family structures both provide support and reinforce restriction. In a study of low-income Karachi settlements, Fikree et al. (2004) found that although more than half of women delivered in facilities, postpartum follow-up remained minimal, only one-quarter of those counseled for check-ups actually attended. Symptoms such as high fever (21.1%) and heavy bleeding (13.9%) were common, yet initial responses involved home remedies or traditional healers before seeking professional help. These patterns reflect how postpartum care is first negotiated within the family, often delaying engagement with formal health systems. Family hierarchies exert strong control over such decisions.

Omer et al. (2021) also observed that these delays, rooted in family authority, contributed directly to maternal deaths. Such examples illustrate how family support systems can function as mechanisms of control when patriarchal expectations prioritize household finances, family reputation, or cultural norms over women’s health. Interpersonal dynamics also intersect with violence and neglect. Fikree and Bhatti (1999) found that 34% of women reported physical abuse, with 15% experiencing violence during pregnancy. Abuse was strongly linked to anxiety and depression, underscoring how harmful relationships compromise not only mental health but also women’s willingness and ability to seek care. Mumtaz et al. (2011) expanded this understanding by showing how gender and caste intersect: in the case studies of Shida and Zainab, domestic violence, indebtedness, and social devaluation prevented access to life-saving care, even when facilities were physically available.

Together, these findings emphasize that interpersonal relationships are double-edged Supportive husbands or peers may encourage health-seeking and family planning, as noted by Habib et al. (2017), but patriarchal family structures often silence women’s preferences, limit mobility, and normalize neglect. For this reason, examining postpartum health in Pakistan requires not only mapping medical access but also analyzing how power circulates within the family system, where decisions about women’s care are often made by others, not the women themselves.

Not all family structures operate in ways that restrict women’s health. Atif et al. (2023) found that when husbands provided consistent emotional and financial support during and after pregnancy, women experienced safer childbirth and improved maternal outcomes. These findings suggest that interpersonal networks are not fixed. When families prioritize women’s health, relationships can shift from acting as barriers to enabling access to care. This matters because it shows that interventions should not only treat families as obstacles but also as potential partners in change. By strengthening supportive roles within households, especially those of husbands, health systems can use existing family structures as entry points for improving maternal and postpartum care.

Patriarchal Norms, Family Power Dynamics, and Women’s Health Decision-Making

Patriarchal authority in Pakistan is a defining factor in women’s ability to access postpartum health care. Studies consistently show that men dominate decision-making in reproductive matters, with women’s voices either sidelined or entirely excluded. Ghani and Hassan (2023) found that in households practicing polygyny, women’s autonomy was particularly constrained, with husbands retaining primary control over maternal health decisions. By contrast, nuclear families were more likely to allow women some say in health matters, suggesting that family form plays a role in shaping the balance of authority. Similarly, Rahman (2025) examined joint-family systems in northern Pakistan and reported that while extended families offered social and financial security, they also entrenched patriarchal hierarchies. In these settings, elder males and mothers-in-law dictated women’s health-related movements, reinforcing women’s dependency and limiting their direct decision-making power.

This concentration of authority is not just cultural but institutionalized in Pakistan’s gender system. Ali (2011) argues that gender roles in Pakistan are reinforced through educational, legal, and policy frameworks that privilege male control. The paper emphasizes that discriminatory practices are embedded in social institutions, making autonomy not just a household issue but a national structural one. At the same time, it also highlights women’s education as a key factor that can disrupt patriarchal expectations, opening limited but meaningful pathways for change.

Patriarchal authority in Pakistan shapes women’s health care choices not only through explicit rules but also through everyday expectations about obedience, modesty, and family honor. These unwritten norms create an environment where women learn early that their well-being is often secondary to household reputation or financial priorities. Even when health services are nearby, many women hesitate to seek them if it means challenging the authority of a husband, elder male, or mother-in-law. In rigid households, decisions about rest, travel to a clinic, or the use of contraception are less about medical need and more about maintaining control. Yet in families where authority is more flexible, these same structures can be reinterpreted: a husband who insists on supporting his wife’s care, or an elder who views postpartum recovery as protecting family strength, can transform patriarchal authority into permission rather than denial.

Socioeconomic Inequalities and Access to Care

Economic and social inequalities are equally powerful in shaping postpartum health outcomes. Aftab et al. (2025) conducted a systematic review of maternal health across South Asia and found that economic status, education, women’s occupation, and autonomy were the strongest determinants of access to maternal health services. In Pakistan specifically, women from poorer households and those without formal education were far less likely to receive skilled postnatal care, showing how inequality translates directly into health gaps. Afridi et al. (2025) further demonstrated this by applying an inequality of opportunity framework to Pakistani DHS data, finding that circumstances beyond women’s control, such as family wealth, parental education, and place of birth, accounted for much of the disparity in maternal health use.

Recent national-level data highlight the persistence of these divides. A study by Maleki et al. (2024) found that illiteracy, unemployment, and rural residence were consistently associated with lower postnatal care use, even when services were theoretically available. They argue that trust in healthcare facilities erodes further among poorer women, who often experience low-quality treatment or unaffordable fees. Similarly, Misu et al. (2023) compared Pakistan with Bangladesh and found that Pakistan’s PNC coverage had the widest inequality gaps by education and wealth. In particular, the richest, most educated women were many times more likely to access postnatal care than the poorest, least educated, suggesting that class-based disparities are entrenched within Pakistan’s health system.

Economic inequality does not only determine whether services are available, but also how women experience them. For many, the decision to seek care is filtered through the reality of daily survival. A woman from a low-income household may know that postnatal check-ups are important, yet the cost of transport, the need to return quickly to wage labor, or the fear of being treated poorly in a public facility can make professional care feel out of reach. By contrast, women in wealthier families often have both the means and the social confidence to demand better treatment, which widens the divide further. These patterns show that access is not just about the existence of clinics but about whether women can realistically use them with dignity and trust. Without addressing these underlying inequalities, expanding services risks reinforcing the very divides it is meant to reduce.

The literature reviewed above highlights major structural inequalities in postpartum care, but it also reveals a gap that my research is designed to address. While existing studies document which groups of women face the greatest barriers, far fewer examine how women themselves interpret postpartum advice, negotiate family expectations, or build trust in medical care after giving birth. Much of the current evidence comes from national surveys or quantitative analyses, which identify patterns but cannot fully capture women’s lived experiences of navigating these inequalities. My study addresses this gap by focusing on women’s postpartum decision making and their perceptions of care quality in everyday life. Based on the literature, I expect to find that socioeconomic constraints interact with family dynamics, cultural norms, and experiences inside healthcare facilities to shape whether women feel able and willing to seek postnatal care. This approach allows my study to contribute a more detailed and grounded understanding of how inequality affects postpartum health access in daily life.

Data and Methods

I chose this research site and population because the Civil Hospital serves a wide range of women from diverse socioeconomic backgrounds, making it an ideal setting for examining how income, education, family roles, and trust in medical care shape postpartum decisions. Surveying 102 women at this location allowed me to reach participants from both urban and peri-urban areas who rely on affordable public healthcare rather than private clinics, which typically serve higher-income families. This site also provided access to both postpartum mothers and first-time pregnant women, making it possible to understand not only women’s reflections after childbirth but also the expectations and concerns that shape care-seeking earlier in pregnancy. Focusing on this diverse population helps address the gap in the literature by providing detailed insight into how women navigate postpartum care in everyday life. Participants ranged in age from late teens to early forties, reflecting the wide reproductive age span served by the clinic. Most respondents were married and living in extended family systems, where mothers-in-law and husbands often influenced decisions about medical treatment and rest. Educational backgrounds varied: while some women had completed secondary or higher education, others had limited formal schooling, particularly those from rural villages surrounding Sialkot. This variation in age, education, and living arrangements made it possible to observe how family authority and socioeconomic conditions differently shaped women’s postpartum experiences and access to care.

The survey instrument was designed to capture both quantitative and qualitative data. Closed-ended questions measured factors such as frequency of clinic visits, type of medical care accessed, involvement of husbands and mothers-in-law in health decisions, and sources of postpartum support. These items provided a systematic picture of women’s access to care and the distribution of decision-making authority within households. To complement this, the survey also included some open-ended questions that encouraged women to share their personal experiences in their own words. These narratives revealed the cultural meanings and emotional aspects of postpartum recovery that numbers alone cannot capture.

Data collection took place through in-person administration to over 100 postpartum and first time pregnant women attending the clinic. In-person surveys reduced literacy barriers and made it possible to build trust with respondents. When appropriate, questions were translated into local dialects to ensure clarity and accessibility. Respondents were assured of confidentiality, and participation was voluntary.

Results

When the data are examined across education, location, trust, and family structure, clear relationships emerge in how social and structural factors shape women’s postpartum experiences. Education level appears to be one of the most influential variables. Among respondents, 18 % had no formal education, another 18 % had completed only primary school, and 35 % had finished secondary school, while 25 % held a college or university degree and 4% had graduate or professional qualifications. Women with higher education were more likely to describe shared or cooperative decision making with their husbands and greater comfort expressing their health needs. For example, many of the women who rated themselves as very comfortable talking to their husbands when they felt unwell were also those with secondary or higher education, contributing to the 70 % who chose the highest comfort rating. Their responses suggested that education provides both knowledge and confidence, allowing them to navigate healthcare systems and negotiate with family authority. In contrast, women with limited or no schooling often relied more heavily on in-laws and deferred to others in medical and household decisions. A 24 year old participant with limited schooling explained, “I wanted to tell the doctor about my pain, but I felt shy. My mother-in-law spoke instead, and she said everything was fine.” This pattern indicates that education not only expands access to information but also influences power dynamics within families, shaping whether a woman’s voice is heard in her recovery process.

Economic inequality also emerged as an underlying factor, reflected indirectly through patterns of residence. None of the 102 respondents lived in major cities such as Karachi or Lahore. Instead, 59 women, or about 58 %, lived in small cities or towns such as Sialkot, and 43 women, about 42 %, lived in rural villages. These distributions suggest that most of the surveyed women live in lower to middle income settings with limited healthcare infrastructure. Regional location also shaped access to education and services. Women in rural or semi rural households often described financial barriers such as the cost of transportation, clinic fees, or medication, which discouraged them from seeking professional care. A 32 year old mother from a rural village said, “The clinic is far and we cannot pay for a rickshaw every time. Sometimes I just stay home and take the advice of my sister-in-law.” In contrast, women from more urbanized or economically stable families, often those with higher education levels, reported greater mobility, better nutrition, and more frequent engagement with healthcare providers. This indicates that geography in Pakistan not only represents physical distance from hospitals but also mirrors economic divisions that influence health outcomes. Economic constraints therefore reinforce social hierarchies, limiting autonomy for poorer women while amplifying dependence on family authority to make healthcare decisions.

Patterns of information sources also reflect underlying social divides. Overall, 91 % of respondents identified family members as a main source of information about pregnancy, while 78 % cited medical professionals. Only small minorities reported relying on social media, 8 %, or journalists, 2 %. Women in rural or small town households, who are more likely to experience economic hardship, appear to depend primarily on informal, family based knowledge networks rather than institutional or technological ones. In contrast, participants with higher education levels and more urban residence more frequently mentioned doctors or online platforms, indicating greater exposure to formal healthcare systems. Despite these differences, trust levels revealed a striking contradiction. Although medical professionals were widely trusted, with 77 % of respondents giving doctors the highest trust rating, many women still deferred to family approval before acting on medical advice. A 29 year old woman living in a joint family shared, “I trust the doctor, but if my husband’s mother says wait, then we wait. It is not my decision alone.” This pattern suggests that economic and cultural hierarchies intersect, where lower income families place collective authority above individual medical autonomy. Women from wealthier or more educated households, by contrast, demonstrated greater confidence in navigating between traditional and professional advice. These findings illustrate how economic inequality influences not only access to information but also the ability to act on trusted knowledge, reinforcing the idea that empowerment depends as much on social permission as it does on awareness.

The survey also highlights how husbands and in-laws shape everyday postpartum support. Most respondents lived with their husbands, 89 %, and a majority also lived with their children, 80 %. Just over half, 51 %, lived with their husband’s parents or other in-laws, reflecting the prevalence of joint or extended household arrangements. During pregnancy and the postpartum period, 60 % of women reported that their husbands helped with household responsibilities daily, while another 25 % received help a few times a week or occasionally. At the same time, 46 % of respondents described their in-laws as “very important” in pregnancy related decisions, and another 18 % said they were “somewhat important,” meaning almost two thirds saw in-laws as significant decision makers. Many women also reported having to compromise their own preferences, with about 67 % agreeing or strongly agreeing that they had to set aside their own wants and feelings to please a husband or another family member. These numbers show that even in households where husbands are supportive, authority is often shared or negotiated with elders.

Satisfaction levels further support these relationships. Nearly three quarters of respondents, 74.5 % , described themselves as very satisfied with their most recent pregnancy experience, and another 16.7% were somewhat satisfied. Many of the women who expressed high satisfaction also reported active spousal involvement and shared household responsibilities. One 26 year old first time mother reflected, “I felt happiest when my husband helped. Even small things made a big difference. When he listened, I felt safe.” This connection suggests that emotional support and cooperative family dynamics can have as much impact on well being as medical treatment itself. On the other hand, women who faced stronger in-law authority or limited say in their own care tended to describe neutral or lower satisfaction levels, indicating that social restrictions can directly affect perceptions of recovery. An older mother of three from a small town commented, “We trust the doctors, but still ask elders before doing anything. It feels wrong to go against them.” Her statement reflects the emotional weight of respect and obedience in shaping decisions.

Spiritual and religious guidance also played a role in women’s experiences. Thirty eight % of respondents reported visiting a religious leader during their most recent pregnancy. Among those who did, 43 % said they went because it provided personal comfort, and another 43 % said they went because in-laws expected or required it. Some also described visits as a result of pressure from husbands or other family members. These patterns show that religious consultations are not only a matter of individual belief but are intertwined with family expectations and authority. For some women, religious leaders provided reassurance alongside medical care. For others, spiritual advice contributed to delays or doubts about biomedical treatment, especially when elders prioritized ritual or tradition over clinical recommendations.

In addition to survey responses, interviews with several women provided deeper insight into how these dynamics unfold in daily life. A 27 year old mother from rural Sialkot explained, “The doctor told me to rest after my delivery, but my mother-in-law said too much lying down makes a woman weak. So, I got up to cook again after two days.” Her statement reflects the tension between professional medical guidance and traditional family expectations. Another participant, a university educated woman living in an urban neighborhood, described a contrasting experience: “My husband and I decide things together. If the doctor says I need medicine, we buy it the same day. He even comes with me to appointments.” These accounts illustrate how education and family structure intersect to shape women’s autonomy.

Taken together, these patterns reveal that postpartum health in Pakistan is shaped by overlapping systems of influence, including education, geography, trust, religion, and family structure, that together determine whether women experience empowerment or constraint. Families remain central to recovery, but their influence can either reinforce patriarchal control or evolve into a source of shared support. As women gain education or move closer to urban environments, they are increasingly able to advocate for themselves, transforming traditional hierarchies from within. These findings highlight that improving maternal well being requires not only access to healthcare but also the reshaping of the social and cultural environments that define how women heal.

Discussion/Conclusion

The results of this study show that postpartum care in Pakistan is shaped not only by access to healthcare but by the social relationships that determine who supports or restricts a woman after childbirth. Education, geography, and trust emerged as the strongest predictors of autonomy and satisfaction. Women with higher education and those living in urban settings described greater independence, stronger partnerships with husbands, and more comfort communicating their needs. In contrast, rural and less-educated women were more likely to depend on in-laws and family approval before acting on medical advice. Yet across these differences, a common thread appeared: families remain the center of care. When relationships were cooperative and emotionally supportive, women were more likely to trust doctors, attend clinics, and report high satisfaction with their recovery. This demonstrates that postpartum health is both a medical and relational outcome, built through dialogue, understanding, and shared responsibility within households.

These findings help answer the core research question by revealing how patriarchal norms and family dynamics interact to shape postpartum recovery. The study challenges the idea that patriarchal families are entirely restrictive and instead shows that change is emerging from within them. Education, communication, and exposure to urban environments are gradually transforming rigid hierarchies into systems of shared authority. This perspective fills a major gap in current literature, which often depicts Pakistani women as passive or powerless. Instead, this research shows that women are active participants who use negotiation, trust, and relational understanding to advocate for their health. The implications are clear: improving maternal well-being requires engaging with the family structure itself, transforming it from a site of control into a network of care.

Theoretically, this study reframes how gender and authority are understood in patriarchal societies. It supports the idea that patriarchy is not a fixed system but a social process that can evolve through education and everyday interaction. Women’s agency operates within these systems, not outside them. By voicing needs, seeking medical help, or involving husbands in decision-making, women subtly reshape cultural norms that once silenced them. This research therefore deepens our understanding of family systems theory and feminist health perspectives by showing that social change often begins at the household level, where shared understanding replaces hierarchy.

From a policy perspective, the results suggest that health interventions should not isolate women from their families but include those families as allies. Programs that encourage spousal communication, provide couple-based counseling, and train community health workers to engage in-laws can bridge the gap between trust in medicine and the freedom to act on it. Expanding education for both men and women remains essential, as knowledge empowers families to move away from harmful customs toward evidence-based care. By focusing on collective education and trust, policymakers can promote care environments that support rather than limit women’s recovery.

Culturally, the findings highlight an ongoing transformation in how families perceive care and authority. Younger, more educated couples often practice forms of partnership that were rare in earlier generations. These evolving relationships reveal that traditional values and modern health practices do not have to conflict; they can coexist when grounded in empathy and communication. This gradual shift from control to cooperation represents a quiet cultural revolution within Pakistani households, one that holds the potential to improve maternal outcomes across communities.

At the emotional and familial level, the research reveals that support functions as a form of healing. When husbands share household work, when mothers-in-law encourage rest rather than judgment, and when women feel safe expressing discomfort, recovery becomes both physical and emotional. Better support creates better pregnancies, not only because it improves access to care but because it restores dignity and peace of mind. Families that nurture women during the postpartum period create cycles of trust that benefit future generations.

Although this study offers important insight into how family structures influence. Because the research was conducted exclusively at the Civil Hospital Gynecology Clinic in Sialkot, the findings likely reflect the experiences of women who have at least some level of access to biomedical care. This means the results may be skewed toward women who are more open to seeking medical help, more trusting of healthcare providers, or more financially and socially able to visit a public hospital. Women who cannot reach facilities at all, or who rely on home births, traditional healers, or private clinics, may face different barriers that are not captured in this sample. If the study had taken place in a rural village, the results might have shown stronger effects of geographic isolation, poverty, or elder family control on postpartum care-seeking. Similarly, a study in a private hospital might have highlighted how wealth shapes access to higher quality services and stronger trust in providers. Using a different research design, such as in-depth interviews or home observations, might also have revealed more detailed information about women who avoid or delay postpartum care entirely. These possibilities show that the sample likely leans toward women who are able to access public healthcare, and future work in alternative settings would provide a fuller picture of postpartum experiences across Pakistan. Additionally, while in-person oral surveys minimized literacy barriers and allowed clarification of questions, they sometimes limited depth, as responses were brief and constrained by time and setting. The modest sample size further restricts generalization to the national level.

Nonetheless, these constraints do not diminish the study’s significance. By centering women’s firsthand narratives within existing family power hierarchies, this research highlights how maternal recovery is shaped less by medical access alone and more by cultural authority within households. Even within a localized setting, these findings illuminate broader social patterns, offering a foundation for future studies and policy efforts aimed at balancing familial influence with maternal autonomy in postpartum care.

In conclusion, this study shows that family authority in Pakistan can either suppress or sustain maternal health, depending on how it is practiced. Education, trust, and shared responsibility act as turning points that redefine what care looks like within patriarchal systems. The research reminds us that true progress in maternal health will not come only from new hospitals or doctors but from reshaping the relationships at home. When families become partners in healing, postpartum care transforms from a private struggle into a collective act of compassion and empowerment.

References

Afridi, J. R., Jan, S. A., & Asif, M. F. (2025). Assessing inequality of opportunity in access to maternal healthcare services in Pakistan: A quantitative attempt. BMC Health Services Research, 25, 1167. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-13312-5

Aftab, I. B., Chakma, T., Ahmed, A., & Haque, S. M. R. (2025). Socioeconomic inequalities in access to maternal healthcare in South-Asian countries: A systematic review. PLOS ONE, 20(6), e0326130. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0326130

Ali, T. S., Krantz, G., Gul, R., Asad, N., Johansson, E., & Mogren, I. (2011). Gender roles and their influence on life prospects for women in urban Karachi, Pakistan: A qualitative study. Global Health Action, 4, 7448. https://doi.org/10.3402/gha.v4i0.7448

Asim, M., Saleem, S., Ahmed, Z. H., Naeem, I., Abrejo, F., Fatmi, Z., & Siddiqi, S. (2021). We won’t go there: Barriers to accessing maternal and newborn care in District Thatta, Pakistan. Healthcare, 9(10), 1314. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9101314

Fikree, F. F., & Bhatti, L. I. (1999). Domestic violence and health of Pakistani women. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 65(2), 195–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7292(99)00035-1

Fikree, F. F., Ali, T., Durocher, J. M., & Rahbar, M. H. (2004). Health service utilization for perceived postpartum morbidity among poor women living in Karachi. Social Science & Medicine, 59(4), 681–694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.11.034

Ghani, A., Hassan, Z. H., & Carlo, D. P. (2023). Decision making autonomy and health of women in reproductive age in Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Social Research, 5(2), 342–351. https://doi.org/10.52567/pjsr.v5i02.1088 Pakistan

Habib, M. A., Raynes-Greenow, C., Nausheen, S., & Soofi, S. (2017). Prevalence and determinants of unintended pregnancies among women attending antenatal clinics in Pakistan. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 17, 304. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1443-4

Kumari, B., Do, M., Madkour, A. S., & Wisniewski, J. M. (2024). Women’s empowerment and current contraceptive use in Pakistan: Informed by theory of gender and power. Frontiers in Global Women’ s Health, 5, 1360052. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgwh.2024.1360052

Maleki, A., Soltani, F., Abasalizadeh, M., & Bakht, R. (2024). Sociodemographic disparities in postnatal care coverage at comprehensive health centers in Hamedan City. Frontiers in Public Health, 12, 1329787. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1329787

Misu, F., & Alam, K. (2023). Comparison of inequality in utilization of postnatal care services between Bangladesh and Pakistan: Evidence from the Demographic and Health Survey 2017–2018. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 23, 461. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-05778-0

Mumtaz, Z., Salway, S., Shanner, L., Bhatti, A., & Laing, L. (2011). Maternal deaths in Pakistan: Intersection of gender, caste, and social exclusion. BMC International Health and Human Rights, 11(Suppl 2), S4. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-698X-11-S2-S4

Omer, S., Mustafa, M., Fawad, A., Memon, M. I., & Shaikh, B. T. (2021). The influence of social and cultural practices on maternal healthcare seeking in South Punjab, Pakistan. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 21, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-03860-2

Rahman, H. U., Khan, S., Din, F. U., & Ahmad, S. (2025). The impact of joint family system on women autonomy: A phenomenological exploration. Indus Journal of Social Sciences, 3(1), 537–548. https://doi.org/10.59075/ijss.v3i1.728

Riaz, S., & Malik, A. (2023). Decision making, autonomy, and health of women in reproductive age in Pakistan. Journal of Women’ s Health Studies.Advance online publication. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371961907_DECISION_MAKING_AUTONOMY_A ND_HEALTH_OF_WOMEN_IN_REPRODUCTIVE_AGE_IN_PAKISTAN

---